USPTO serial 78167060
THE PROCUREMENT INTELLIGENCE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE PROCUREMENT INTELLIGENCE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Walnut Creek,, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel, Esq., Tanda L. Neundorf, Esq.
SALLY M ABEL, ESQ TANDA L NEUNDORF FENWICK & W LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQPALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer-related services, namely, computer software model development services and computer project management services; computer software consultation; computer software development; computer software installation, implementation, configuration, maintenance, and updating; technical support services offered to customers in connection with the use, operation and implementation of computer software; customer and technical support services related to the implementation, integration and maintenance of software for extracting, collecting, translating, organizing, normalizing, correlating, categorizing, analyzing and prioritizing unstructured data and content, procurement data and purchasing data; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in database management and for organizing unstructured data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |