USPTO serial 78170150
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. McKie, Frederick W. Meyers, Dermot J. Horgan, W. Dennis Drehkoff, Vangelis Economou, James Kurtz, Paul D. McGrady, Sally J. Utley, Lindsey E. Welu, Richard J. Streit
FREDERICK W MEYERS, DERMOT J HORGAN, J LADAS & PARRY224 S MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical, surgical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely medical equipment and apparatus for diagnosing nerve and muscle damages; medical equipment and apparatus for electrotherapy for the purpose of alleviating pain, strengthening and stimulating muscles and treating inflammations; medical equipment and apparatus for acupuncture treatment, namely, electric and non-electric acupuncture instruments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Sporting articles for strengthening and stimulating muscles; namely, [ elelctrostimulators ] *electrostimulators* | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |