USPTO serial 78172916
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirstin M. Jahn
KIRSTIN M JAHN JAHN & ASSOCIATES1942 BROADWAY STE 314BOULDER, CO 80302UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Gaming equipment, namely, slot machines with or without video output, electro-mechanical gaming machines, electronic gaming machines | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |