Drawing for AMERICAN HEROES

USPTO serial 78172916

AMERICAN HEROES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, ALINA S.
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICAN HEROES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kirstin M. Jahn

KIRSTIN M JAHN JAHN & ASSOCIATES1942 BROADWAY STE 314BOULDER, CO 80302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Gaming equipment, namely, slot machines with or without video output, electro-mechanical gaming machines, electronic gaming machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 16, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 16, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 2, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 5, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 28, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 28, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 27, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 20, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2002PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance