USPTO serial 78176021
DEJA VU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEJA VU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Indie K. Singh
INDIE K SINGH INDIE K SINGH, ATTORNEY AT LAW550 W MERRICK RDVALLEY STREAM, NY 11580-5101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Women's wearing apparel, namely suits,jackets, blouses,skirts, trousers, shorts, dresses and women's sportswear namely suits, shirts, blouses, jackets, skirts, trousers, shorts, rompers and jumpsuits | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 2002 |
| 035 | on-line retail services featuring women's lingerie and undergarments | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |