USPTO serial 78176222
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Whitelaw
JENNIFER WHITELAW WHITELAW LEGAL GROUP3838 TAMIAMI TRAIL N 3RD FLNAPLES, FL 34103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional supplements; herbal products, namely herbal supplements; herbal products, namely medicated skin and lip balms; herbal products for medicinal purposes, namely herbal extracts for use as nutritional and dietary supplements; herbal products, namely medicinal ointments, oils, poisons and tinctures for medical use in the treatment of strokes, infarcts and other cardiovascular and cerebrum diseases; herbal products, namely herbal meal replacement powders for dietary and nutritional purposes; herbal products, namely aroma therapy packs filled with herbs for use in aroma therapy; nutritional dietary supplements; vitamin and mineral preparations intended for use as dietary supplements; vitamins; food supplements; pharmaceuticals and nutriceuticals, namely prescription vitamins and food supplements; pharmaceutical preparations, namely appetite suppressants and lipid lowering agents; food for medically restricted diets; food supplements, namely anti-oxidants; and food for diabetics, infants and enteral feeding | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |