USPTO serial 78176416
LAND ROVER CONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAND ROVER CONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Warwickshire, GB
Warwickshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria F. Angileri
Maria F. Angileri Brooks Kushman P.C.1000 Town Center22nd FloorSouthfield, MI 48075Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the sale of goods and services of others by dissemination of promotional material through an on-line global computer network, through the distribution of printed material, audio and video tapes, television and radio broadcasts, namely, providing television and radio advertisements for others, and promotional contests, and through the administration of customer loyalty programs; providing dealership incentive award programs to recognize dealership excellence; motor vehicle dealership services; business and advertising services, namely, placing advertisements for others in the field of automobile sales; providing on-line information regarding electronic coupons for ordering and purchasing vehicles and motor vehicle parts, to the purchaser's specifications; retail store services in the fields of automotive parts, accessories, and clothing; business services, namely, customer service and customer relationship management for others in the field of automobiles; providing on-line information for automotive consumer and dealers regarding vehicles regarding pricing, vehicle dealer locations, promotional vehicle electronic coupons; providing on-line information for inventory management in the field of vehicle availability and vehicle parts availability; computerized on-line retail services in the field of vehicles, vehicles parts; on-line ordering of vehicles to the purchaser's specifications; providing on-line information regarding customer relationship management | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | On-line financing of vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Providing on-line information for automotive consumer and dealers regarding vehicle parts and accessory options, vehicle specifications, vehicle recall notices, vehicle maintenance reminders, vehicle manufacturing, engineering and repair; motor club services, namely, emergency road side services | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Leasing of new and used motor vehicles; motor vehicle fleet leasing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Testing and designing for others in the field of motor vehicles, automotive electronics, software, multimedia systems and climate control systems; motor vehicle inspection services; designing web sites for others in the field of motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Land Rover
- Other trademarks owned by Land Rover
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LAND ROVER CONNECT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 24, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |