USPTO serial 78180073
ORPHALESE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORPHALESE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Culver City, CA
Culver City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
I. Morley Drucker
I MORLEY DRUCKER FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLP6060 CTR DR TENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Travel agency services, namely making reservations and bookings for transportation for discounted airline travel and for specialized recreation vacation packages; arranging group vacation excursions and Cruise ship services, travel guide services, tourist agency services, stevedoring services and porter services. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |