USPTO serial 78180266
X4D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with X4D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Warren A. Sklar
WARREN A SKLAR RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR19TH FL1621 EUCLID AVECLEVELAND, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Three dimensional and stereoscopic viewing devices and systems, namely, television, monitor, projection, autostereoscopic, stereoscopic, cathode ray tube, liquid crystal, plasma, light emitting diode, and organic light emitting diode displays for displaying images for viewing by individuals, active viewing glasses having operable light shutters, passive viewing glasses having lenses that discriminate light transmission according to characteristics of the light, and photographic, movie, slide and digital projectors for projecting images for viewing by individuals either directly or via a screen onto which an image is projected, electric circuits for converting two dimensional images to three dimensional images, three dimensional imaging systems consisting of hardware and software for presenting display of images over a global computer network, electric circuits to provide signals representing images for display in two dimensions and in three dimensions, computer software and hardware for displaying three dimensional images, computer software and hardware for converting two dimensional images to three dimensional images for display and for viewing, computer software plug-ins for displaying three dimensional images and for viewing three dimensional images, computer software plug-ins for converting two dimensional images to three dimensional images for display and for viewing, three dimensional imaging systems consisting of hardware and software for displaying three dimensional images by television, by computer monitors, for transmission of signals over a global computer network or other network for displaying three dimensional images and for viewing three dimensional images, three dimensional and stereoscopic entertainment systems, namely, computer game programs and movies for entertainment, education, commercials, and sales presentations, and computer and electronic hardware, namely, electronic circuit cards, computers, amplifiers, video signal processors, video circuits, video presentation circuit boards, signal accelerators, and image display driving circuits, and computer software for providing display of games and movies and for playing games, stereoscopic three dimensional viewers for viewing three dimensional images by an individual directly or from a screen, modular three dimensional image viewing shutter glasses, electric circuitry and computer software for displaying three dimensional images on a television or on a computer monitor, electronic circuits and computer hardware and computer programs for synthesyzing stereoscopic images, electric circuits, computer hardware and computer software for stereoscopic virtual reality image generating functions and image display for use in e-commerce, entertainment and education | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |