USPTO serial 78182783
TRUSTGATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRUSTGATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott K. Haight
SCOTT K HAIGHT BUTLER, SNOW, O'MARA, STEVENS & CANNADAPO BOX 171443MEMPHIS TN, 38187 1443U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION; COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE AND FIRMWARE FOR CONNECTING GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND VIRTUAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER FIRE WALL SOFTWARE AND FIRMWARE; COMPUTER SECURITY PRODUCTS, NAMELY SOFTWARE AND PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT FOR SECURE COMMUNICATION, ENCRYPTION, KEY GENERATION, AUTHENTICATION, CONFIDENTIALITY, AND ACCESS CONTROL; HARDWARE AND PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT FOR TRUSTED THIRD PARTY SERVICES, NAMELY CERTIFICATES, ATTRIBUTES, INSTANT CERTIFICATES, QUALIFIED CERTIFICATES, CERTIFICATION, DIGITAL CREDENTIALS, DIGITAL IDENTITIES, DIGITAL PRIVILEGES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |