USPTO serial 78187645
KEYFRAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KEYFRAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KEYFRAME DIGITAL PRODUCTIONS INC.
Niagara-on-the-Lake, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Hofbauer, Registration No. 32,336
PATRICK J HOFBAUER HOFBAUER ASSOCIATESSTE 205 N 1455 LAKESHORE RDBURLINGTON, ON L7S 2J1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motion picture films featuring educational materials, news, documentaries and entertainment, namely, continuing variety shows, action adventures, dramas, comedies, cartoons, romances, musicals, science fiction, horror and mysteries; musical video recordings; and prerecorded video tapes featuring educational materials, news, documentaries, and entertainment, namely, continuing variety shows, action adventures, dramas, comedies, cartoons, romances, musicals, science fiction, horror and mysteries | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Color enhancement of black and white film; color enhancement of black and white video film; digital imaging services; digital restoration and/or enhancement of motion picture films and prerecorded video tapes; electronic imaging, scanning, digitizing, alteration and/or retouching of visual materials, namely, motion picture films and prerecorded video tapes; motion picture and television program computer imaging; and video transfer, namely,providing color correction and conversion of motion picture film to video film | ACTIVE | May 31, 1997 |
| 041 | Cinematographic adaptation and editing; entertainment, namely, motion picture films and television shows featuring educational materials, news, documentaries, and entertainment, namely, continuing variety shows, action adventures, dramas, comedies, cartoons, romances, musicals, science fiction, horror and mysteries; entertainment services, namely, production of television shows, and motion pictures; entertainment services, namely, preparation of special effects; motion picture film production; production of motion pictures; and production of cable television programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |