USPTO serial 78198227
DARDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 9, 2005
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DARDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sungnam-City, Kyunggi-Do, KR
Sungnam-City, Kyunggi-Do, KR
Sungnam-City, Kyunggi-Do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A.Pelletier, Jr.
GEORGE A PELLETIER JR CANTOR COLBURN, LLP55 GRIFFIN RD SBLOOMFIELD CT, 06002U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Rusks, biscuits, ice cream, cookies, waffles, popped popcorn, cocoa, tea, coffee | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 11, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 30, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |