USPTO serial 78201176
ASSET CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASSET CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John V. Moriarty
JOHN V MORIARTY WOODARD EMHARDT NAUGHTON MORIARTY & MCNE111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS IN, 46204 5137U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | underwriting for long term care, annuities, and life insurance | ACTIVE | Jun 27, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2005 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |