USPTO serial 78203578
METAWEB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3562435Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2009
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with METAWEB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
Glendale, CA
Glendale, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Johanna Sistek
Google Inc.1600 Amphitheatre ParkwayMountain View, CA 94043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, database and database management software in the field of a public registry of signed statements containing commercial and technical documents, reviews, commentary, and reputation information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 9, 2007 |
| 035 | Business management and administration services, namely, services in connection with the management of business and commercial information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 9, 2007 |
| 041 | Education and training services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, and courses in the field of information management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 9, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GOOGLE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Applied Minds, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Applied Minds, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by METAWEB TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by METAWEB TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named METAWEB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 31, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |