USPTO serial 78203641
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
AYDINLIK ULUSLARARASI TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by AYDINLIK ULUSLARARASI TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
AYDINLIK ULUSLARARASI TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by AYDINLIK ULUSLARARASI TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
AYDINLIK ULUSLARARASI TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by AYDINLIK ULUSLARARASI TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON TX, 77002U.S. ARMY| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Fragrance products, namely, cologne, eau de toilette, perfume, scented soaps, body powders, bath oils; cosmetic products, namely, lipstick, foundation, blush, eye shadow, mascara, eyeliner, lipstick liner, nail polish, nail polish remover; skin treatment products, namely, cleanser, toner, moisturizer, eye cream, makeup remover, hand and body lotion; body and facial soap, anti-bacterial soap; sun screen; hair products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, styling gels, and sprays; toothpaste and mouthwash; laundry bleach, detergent, and fabric softener; general purpose household cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations in solid, gel and fluid forms, namely, furniture polish, degreasing cleaning preparations, powdered scouring cleaner, window cleaner, tile and bathroom cleaner, toilet bowl cleaner, vinyl cleaner, wood polish, brass polish, steel polish; stain removers for clothing; carpet cleaners, carpet stain removers; dishwashing detergents; decalcifying and descaling preparations for cleaning household products; liquid paint removers and paint strippers; stripping, cleaning and finishing preparations for floors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather sold in bulk; leather goods, namely, traveling sets, namely, luggage; leather straps for luggage, purses, pocket wallets, shaving bags sold empty, cosmetic cases sold empty, tool bags sold empty, briefcases, school bags, waist packs; animal skins, animal hides; luggage, luggage tags, trunks and traveling bags; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips, harnesses and saddlery | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Textiles and textile products, namely, curtains, draperies, banners, flags, and wall hangings; bedding, namely, spreads, quilts, comforters, pillow cases, bed sheets, dust ruffles, duvet covers, mattress covers, and mattress pads; table covers not made of paper; hand towels, kitchen towels, washcloths, and bath towels; handkerchiefs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shorts, shirts, t-shirts, swimsuits, blouses, skirts, scarves, gloves, pants, sweaters, jerseys, socks, jackets, suits, training suits, vests, neckties, belts, suspenders, dresses, coats, raincoats, overcoats, smocks, underwear, pajamas, brassieres, corsets, slips, lingerie; headwear, namely, hats, caps and berets; footwear, namely, boots, sandals, shoes and slippers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |