Drawing for IMAGENETICS

USPTO serial 78218384

IMAGENETICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYS, PAULA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMAGENETICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jorge C. Barreno

JORGE C BARRENO APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS850 LINCOLN CTR DRFOSTER CITY CA, 94404U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Reagents for scientific research use; biological inhibitors used to reduce the activity of a biological moleculeACTIVE—
005Therapeutics for use in the field of cardiovascular disease, auto-immunity, central nervous system disorders, infectious diseases and cancer; Diagnostic reagents for clinical or medical laboratory use; medical diagnostic reagents; Reagents for use in medical research; biological inhibitors used to reduce the activity of a biological moleculeACTIVE—
009Computer software used for collection, storage, organization, analysis, integration and communication of information in the fields of science, diagnostics, medicine and therapeuticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 18, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 17, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 5, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Apr 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 1, 2005ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 22, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 13, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance