Drawing for ECOTREAT

USPTO serial 78218851

ECOTREAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOTREAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SANA HAKIM

SANA HAKIM BELL BOYD & LLOYD LLCPO BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Treated lumber for use in interiors and exteriors of buildings, structures and homes, and treated lumber for use in fences patios, decks, furniture, pallets, mulch, and landscaping materials; non-metal fence posts and panels made of wood and wood composites treated for protection against mold, rot, mildew and insect infestationACTIVE—
020Non-metal pallets and furniture treated for protection against mold, rot, mildew and insect infestationACTIVE—
031Mulch treated for protection against mold, rot, mildew and insect infestationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 14, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance