Drawing for CTD

USPTO serial 78220826

CTD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CTD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heather A. Dunn, Esq.

HEATHER A DUNN ESQ GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP8TH FL153 TOWNSEND STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107-1907

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs utilizing algorithmic methods to measure telecommunications trafficABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2005ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 21, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 20, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 23, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 30, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance