USPTO serial 78228934
MPV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MPV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Sigalow
DAVID L SIGALOW ALLEN, DYER, DOPPELT, MILBRATH ET AL255 S ORANGE AVE STE 1401ORLANDO, FL 32801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Consumer audio, image, and video playback devices, namely CD players and DVD players and memory card players and hard disk drive players; optical media, namely, blank compact discs and digital versatile discs and prerecorded compact discs and prerecorded digital versatile discs featuring music, pictures, live performances, entertainment and motion pictures; consumer audio, image, and video recording devices, namely CD recorders and DVD recorders and digital cameras; consumer audio, image, and video disc recording software applications, namely software applications that manage audio, image, and video content and record it to recordable CD and DVD; consumer audio, image, and video content transfer applications, namely software applications that manage audio, image, and video content and transfer it onto portable storage media such as memory cards and removable hard disk drives | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |