Drawing for KPG

USPTO serial 78232595

KPG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KPG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eunice P. de Carvalho

EUNICE P DE CARVALHO FAEGRE & BENSON LLP90 S 7TH ST2200 WLS FARGO CTRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Imaging chemicals for use in color imaging technology, printing, graphic arts, and packaging industries, printing chemicals in the field of lithography, proofing and photography, chemical developer, stabilizer and fountain solution concentrates for use on printing plates; photographic chemicals; photosensitive papers, chemically-treated papers and chemically-coated papers for imaging with a proofing apparatus for making color proofs; photosensitive paper, namely, image setting papers and phototypesetting papers; unexposed photographic and proofing imaging film; image setting film in the nature of photographic and proofing film; unexposed photographic and proofing contact and duplicating film; unexposed polymeric film for use in the graphic arts field namely, scanner film, camera film, recording film, and unexposed color plastic overlay sheets for use in creating a proofACTIVE—
016Proofing paper, namely, test forms for checking the proofing processACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 9, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 22, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance