USPTO serial 78235005
VERA WANG COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERA WANG COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth M. Goldman
Beth M. Goldman Heller Ehrman LLP333 Bush StreetSan Francisco, CA 94104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Wastepaper baskets, soap dishes, tumblers, toilet tissue holders, trays for use in fingernail polishing, toothbrush holders, and dispensers for liquid hand lotion | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Towels, bed sheets, pillow cases, pillow shams, bed skirts, comforters, bed blankets, comforter and blanket covers, fabric curtains, shower curtains, tablecloths not of paper, cloth coasters, textile napkins, textile placemats, fabric table runners, pot holders, oven mitts, unfitted fabric furniture covers, blanket throws, dust ruffles and duvet covers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |