USPTO serial 78240185
DAVE THE BARBARIAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAVE THE BARBARIAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARBARA QUINN
BARBARA QUINN THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded audio cassettes and compact discs featuring music and children's stories; pre-recorded video cassettes, laser video discs, digital video discs and digital versatile discs, featuring animated entertainment, namely children's cartoons; CD-ROM discs, computer game programs and computer software, featuring entertainment and educational activities for children, namely, stories and games for children, application of math skills, application of problem solving skills, vocabulary enhancement, application of patterns, application of reading skills, sorting and classifying skills and instruction and application in geometry and symmetry skills; motion picture films featuring animated stories for children; eyeglasses; sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |