Drawing for BEAR ROULETTE

USPTO serial 78240839

BEAR ROULETTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAR ROULETTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045PROVIDING LINKS TO WEBSITES OF OTHERS FEATURING LARGE, HAIRY, HOMOSEXUALSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 13, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 14, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 13, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 15, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 6, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 26, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2004PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Dec 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 23, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance