USPTO serial 78243293
LECHTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LECHTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Town of Mont-Royal, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jody L. Factor
JODY L FACTOR FACTOR & PARTNERS, LLC.1327 W WASHINGTON BLVD STE 5G/HCHICAGO, IL 60607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery, apple corers, bagel cutters, butter curlers, non-electric can openers, cherry pitters, julienne slicers, meat tenderizers in the nature of meat mallets, mortars and pestles, nut crackers not of precious metal, pizza cutters,scissors, non-electric vegetable peelers, and zesters | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Bakeware; barware, namely corkscrews, ice buckets, tongs, wine cooling pails, cocktail shakers, jiggers, household utensils, namely, strainers, wine racks; cookware, namely pots, pans, skillets and steamers; dinnerware made of china, earthenware, stoneware or plastic, teapots not made of precious metal, coffeepots not made of precious metal, sugar bowls and creamers not made of precious metal; stemware and glassware, namely tumblers, drinking glasses, cocktail glasses, goblets, flutes, wine glasses, shot glasses, decorative glasses, pitchers, decanters, cups, bowls, serving plates, serving trays and jugs; kitchenware, namely non-electric kettles, spice racks, wine racks, brooms; cooking utensils, namely banana trees, basters, beater whips, bottle openers, bowl covers, cake racks, cake and pie servers, cake tins, cooling racks, cake covers, cake decorating sets, coasters, colanders for household use, cookie presses, cookie cutters, cookie molds, cookie stamps, corn server and holder sets, corn skewers, cutting boards, dish drying racks, non-electric egg beaters, egg cups, egg piercer, egg poachers, egg ring, egg separator, flour sifters, fondue sets, funnels, garlic keepers, garlic presses, graters, hand-operated coffee grinders, honey dippers ice cream scoops, ice cube trays, jar openers, non-electric juicers, kitchen utensil tool caddies, knife blocks, kitchen ladles, manual milk frothers, melon ballers, mixing bowls, mixing spoons, cake molds, mushroom brushes, pastry brushes, pizza stones, potato masher, potato ricer, poultry lacers, rolling pins, salad servers, salad spinners, salt and pepper shakers, salt and pepper grinders, serving spoons, slush kebob sets, cooking skewers and skimmers,slotted spoons, soap dispensers, spaghetti measurer, spaghetti tongs, household utensils, namely spatulas, spoon rest, stirrers, strainers, tea bag holders, tea balls and made of non-precious metal, tea infusers, tea strainers, whisks, wine pouring spouts, oil and vinegar sets, spice, cheese, flour and icing shakers; recipe boxes; napkin holders; napkin rings not made of precious metals; vases, bowls and serving trays made of glass, ceramic, porcelain, plastic, stainless steel or wood | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |