Drawing for FCI CERTIFIED FACILITY RESTRICTED USE PROTEIN PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 78259023

FCI CERTIFIED FACILITY RESTRICTED USE PROTEIN PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FCI CERTIFIED FACILITY RESTRICTED USE PROTEIN PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. O'Flaherty

MICHAEL J OFLAHERTY OLSSON FRANK & WEEDA1400 16TH ST NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-2220UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
AAnimal feedACTIVEMar 31, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2005MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Dec 12, 2005ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
May 16, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2005CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 18, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 18, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 20, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance