USPTO serial 78267412
WINE NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2888017Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 2004
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WINE NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Georgetown, Grand Cayman, KY
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely the production and distribution of educational, informational and entertainment programs concerning topics of interest to wine enthusiasts for transmission by others via television, cable, satellite, wireless, telco and internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |