Drawing for GWD

USPTO serial 78275299

GWD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3235779Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2007
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GWD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony F. Lo Cicero

Anthony F. Lo Cicero Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP90 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Research, analysis and interpretation of surface mudlogging gas dataSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2013C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jun 26, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 25, 2013C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jun 25, 2013C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jun 25, 2013ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 1, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 14, 2007DP1B1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION—
Feb 26, 2007IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Feb 26, 2007D1BRTEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2004CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance