Drawing for MEZZO PIANO

USPTO serial 78276233

MEZZO PIANO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEZZO PIANO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire

MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA ESQ HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Handbag frames; purse frames; clothing for domestic pets; traveling trunks and traveling cases, attache cases, document cases, purses, wallets, cosmetic bags and bags for beauty cases sold empty, ladies handbags, baby carriers worn on the body, backpacks, all purpose athletic bags, all purpose sport bags, beach bags, carry-on bags, clutch bags, duffel bags, leather shopping bags, overnight bags, school bags, shoulder bags, textile shopping bags, tote bags, travel bags, garment bags for travel, briefcases, suitcases, luggage, key cases, briefcase-type portfolios, non-motorized collapsible luggage carts; vanity cases sold empty; umbrellas and their parts, namely, frames for umbrellas, umbrella covers, umbrella handles, umbrella rings; walking sticks; canes; saddlery; leather sold in bulkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 10, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 11, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 29, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 20, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance