Drawing for S.W.A.T.

USPTO serial 78278757

S.W.A.T.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3172010Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 14, 2006
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S.W.A.T.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dax Alvarez

DAX ALVAREZ BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD., FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Watches, Wrist and clip styleSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2010C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Aug 2, 2010CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 14, 2010CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Dec 27, 2006PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 3, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 23, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 23, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 26, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 26, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 25, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 23, 2005PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
May 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 24, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 27, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 2, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance