Drawing for VINTEMP

USPTO serial 78285117

VINTEMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3291472Status 712
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 11, 2007
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VINTEMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A. Gast

David A. Gast Malloy & Malloy, P.A.2800 SW 3rd AvenueMiami, FL 33129UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cork screwsSECTION 37 - CANCELLEDMay 15, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2009CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 8, 2009C37.CANCELLED SECTION 37-TOTAL—
Feb 24, 2009CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jun 20, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2008NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Sep 20, 2007PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 11, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 8, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jun 13, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 27, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 27, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 24, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 10, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 26, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 19, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 19, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 19, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 5, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 5, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2005UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Nov 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 15, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 31, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 14, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 31, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 8, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 19, 200444DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Mar 19, 20041.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Mar 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance