USPTO serial 78285117
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Prologix International Corporation
Boca Raton, FL
Other trademarks owned by Prologix International Corporation
Prologix International Corporation
Boca Raton, FL
Other trademarks owned by Prologix International Corporation
Prologix International Corporation
Boca Raton, FL
Other trademarks owned by Prologix International Corporation
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Gast
David A. Gast Malloy & Malloy, P.A.2800 SW 3rd AvenueMiami, FL 33129UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Cork screws | SECTION 37 - CANCELLED | May 15, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | C37. | CANCELLED SECTION 37-TOTAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |