USPTO serial 78307748
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN JOSE, CA
SAN JOSE, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel C. Poliak
Daniel C. Poliak Adobe Systems Incorporated801 North 34th StreetLegal DepartmentSeattle, WA 98103| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software platform for mobile communications services; computer software for the management, deployment and display of data and content on wireless computers, wireless computer peripherals, wireless computer gaming machines, handheld computers, handheld computer peripherals, handheld computer gaming machines, personal digital assistants, electronic organizers, cellular telephones, kiosks and interactive electronic displays; computer software for wireless electronic data transmission and synchronization; computer software for broadcasting, viewing, playing, and interacting with animation, video, sound, graphics, presentations, images, modeling, website content, motion pictures, and entertainment-related multimedia content; computer software for providing access to, providing information to, and obtaining information from computer networks; computer programs for accessing, browsing and searching online databases; instant messaging software; telephony management software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 9, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 13, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 2, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |