USPTO serial 78318970
EX2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EX2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta R. Wilson
ROBIN FRANKE QUANTUM NUTRITIONALS LLC8585 PGA DR STE 106WALLED LAKE, MI 48390UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Flavored and unflavored drinking water; flavored and unflavored aerated water; fruit flavored drinks; fruit juices; fruit drinks; aerated fruit juices; aerated fruit flavored drinks; aerated fruit drinks; concentrates, syrups and powders for making soft drinks, fruit flavored drinks or sport drinks; soft drinks; fruit flavored soft drinks; non carbonated soft drinks; sport drinks; dietary supplemental drinks; meal replacement drinks; nutrient replacement drinks; and mineral replacement drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |