USPTO serial 78323374
WRAPPING MORE TALENT MORE TIGHTLY AROUND CLIENT'S BRANDS AND BUSINESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WRAPPING MORE TALENT MORE TIGHTLY AROUND CLIENT'S BRANDS AND BUSINESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dean R. Karau
DEAN R KARAU FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA200 S 6TH ST STE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and business services, namely, strategic planning, market research, public relations, database marketing in the field of advertising in the nature of research and consultation for list sources and data sources and market analysis of files containing customer information, computerized database management in the nature of creating broadcast and print advertising campaigns for others, placing broadcast and print advertising for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Services relating to data transfer and physical conversion from one media to another, namely, transferring photographic and graphic images into digital and electronic form | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Services related to graphic design, retail photograph, illustration, lithography, printing, computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others, and consulting services regarding computer systems; data mining in the field of advertising | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Periscope, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Periscope, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WRAPPING MORE TALENT MORE TIGHTLY AROUND CLIENT'S BRANDS AND BUSINESS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |