USPTO serial 78332020
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea L. Hirst
ANDREA L HIRST BROOKSTONE COMPANY INCONE INNOVATION WAYMERRIMACK, NH 03054UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | rolling garden conveyances; namely, personal garden scooter, trolleys, and carts | ABANDONED | Mar 11, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |