Drawing for OFF-LEASH

USPTO serial 78332626

OFF-LEASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OFF-LEASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen M. Evans

Stephen M. Evans GRAYBEAL JACKSON HALEY LLP155 - 108TH AVE NESUITE 350BELLEVUE, WA 98004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Pet products, namely, pet collars, carabiners, leads, leashes, harnesses and related attachments, namely clips, and straps; bags, namely, duffel bags, pet supply carrying cases, all purpose sports bags, backpacks, wallets, tote bags, waist packs; and pet clothing, namely parkas, sweaters, and water repellent raingearACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, jackets, vests, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, jeans, bandanas, pants, shorts, halters, tank tops, swim trunks, swimsuits, belts, socks, gloves, hats, visors, caps, shoes and bootsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 1, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 26, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 26, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 26, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 8, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 27, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 27, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 5, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 24, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance