Drawing for CAN'T GET ENOUGH

USPTO serial 78335854

CAN'T GET ENOUGH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAN'T GET ENOUGH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles Steinberg

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Rubber action balls; action figures and accessories therefor; action skill games; bean bag dolls; plush toys; balloons; golf balls; tennis balls; bath toys; Christmas tree ornaments; board games; toy building blocks; equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; playing cards; dolls and doll clothing; doll playsets; children's play cosmetics; crib toys; electric action toys; manipulative games; golf gloves; golf ball markers; jigsaw puzzles; kites; crib and toy mobiles; music box toys; party favors in the nature of small toys; inflatable pool toys; baby and children's multiple activity toys; wind-up toys; target games; disc-type toss toys; toy bows and arrows; toy vehicles; model toy cars; model toy trucks; toy bucket and shovel sets; roller skates; toy model hobby craft kits; toy rockets; toy guns; toy holsters; musical toys; toy badminton sets; bubble making wands and solution sets; modeled plastic toy figurines; toy banks; puppets; yo-yos; skateboards; toy scooters; face masks; hand-held unit for playing electronic games; talking toys; toy model walkie-talkies; toy model electronic voice recordersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 24, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance