USPTO serial 78350387
PFM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PFM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Mixture of polymers and fibers in an aqueous slurry, namely, natural and synthetic polymers, namely, polyacrylamide, polybutadiene, polyurathane,poly-vinyl acetate, poly-vinyl acriate, co-polymers; ammonium acrylate,polyvinyls, latex, vegetable gums, namely guar; plantego, corn starch,tamarind, all of the foregoing used as soil binders, mulch tackifers, and glues, all applied to the soil surface to prevent or control soil erosion caused by wind and rain and for dust control | ACTIVE | Jan 9, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 20, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |