Drawing for BELLWAVE

USPTO serial 78352476

BELLWAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BELLWAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AnneMarie Kaiser

ANNEMARIE KAISER KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST STE 1400IRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MOBILE PHONESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 16, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 16, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 16, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 15, 2006ABNDABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB—
Feb 15, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 15, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 13, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 7, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 7, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 11, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 4, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 4, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance