Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78361756?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78361756. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns FUSIBLE PVC?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78361756, the listed owner(s) include: Underground Solutions, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78361756?

Serial number 78361756 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark FUSIBLE PVC. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover FUSIBLE PVC?

The public record lists International Classes: 017. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78361756

FUSIBLE PVC

Q: What is the current status of FUSIBLE PVC?

FUSIBLE PVC (78361756) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Feb 3, 2004
Status date: Jan 5, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUSIBLE PVC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Underground Solutions, Inc.
Sarver, PA
Other trademarks owned by Underground Solutions, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Matthew Pritchard

J MATTHEW PRITCHARD WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN & HANSON700 KOPPERS BLDG 436 7TH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1818UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
017	Plastic piping, namely, piping manufactured from polyvinyl chloride for the installation, rehabilitation and repair of potable water lines, fire mains, force mains and municipal and industrial wastewater lines	ACTIVE	Jul 31, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jan 16, 2007	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jan 5, 2007	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jan 5, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Nov 20, 2006	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Jul 19, 2006	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jul 19, 2006	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jan 19, 2006	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED	—
Jan 19, 2006	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED	—
Jan 19, 2006	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	—
Jan 3, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 14, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 14, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2005	IUAA	USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED	—
May 20, 2005	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 20, 2005	AUPC	AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
May 12, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 12, 2005	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
May 12, 2005	EAAU	TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED	—
May 12, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2004	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2004	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 2004	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Oct 8, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 8, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Aug 27, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Feb 12, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—