Drawing for JUST ADD AIR

USPTO serial 78362881

JUST ADD AIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOE, KELLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JUST ADD AIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward M. Weisz and Myron Cohen; Thomas C. Pontani, Ph.D.; Lance J. Lieberman; Martin B. Pavane; Thomas Langer; Michael C. Stuart; William A. Alper; Kent H. Cheng, Ph.D.; Sidney R. Bresnick; Yunling Ren, Ph.D.; Julia S. Kim; Mindy H. Chettih; Vincent M. F

EDWARD M WEISZ COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 FIFTH AVE STE 1210NEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020BEDS AND BEDDING; INFLATABLE MATTRESSES; MATTRESS COVERS; SLEEPING BAGS; AND SLEEPING BAGS INCORPORATING INFLATABLE MATTRESSESACTIVEJan 5, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 2, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2004GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2004CPEASU - EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - WRITTEN—
Aug 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance