USPTO serial 78364032
WILDFLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WILDFLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WEST PERTH WA 6005, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cami Dawson Boyd
CAMI DAWSON BOYD DOCKET CLERKDAVIS MUNCK BUTRUS PCPO DRAWER 800889DALLAS, TX 75380Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | wines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |