USPTO serial 78374612
S MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3538547Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 25, 2008
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with S MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn S. Fruchter
Lynn S. Fruchter COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC114 West 47th StreetNEW YORK, NY 10036-1525UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | [ TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, DATA TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION SERVICES VIA TELECOMMUNICATION MEANS; PROVIDING ACCESS TO TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS AND PROVIDING ELECTRONIC TELECOMMUNICATION CONNECTIONS; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, GRAPHICS BY MEANS OF TELEPHONE, TELEGRAPHIC, CABLE, AND SATELLITE TRANSMISSIONS; ] CABLE RADIO AND TELEVISION BROADCASTING, [ RADIO ] AND TELEVISION BROADCASTING SERVICES; WIRELESS, [ LASER BEAM ] AND MICROWAVE TRANSMISSION AND BROADCASTING OF TELEVISION PROGRAMS; CABLE, SATELLITE AND DIRECT TO HOME TRANSMISSION AND DIFFUSION OF TELEVISION PROGRAMS; ON-LINE TRANSMISSION AND DIFFUSION THROUGH COMPUTER NETWORKS AND VIDEO SERVERS OF TELEVISION PROGRAMS [ ; TELETEXT SERVICES RELATING TO THE FOREGOING SERVICES ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2023 | NCS7 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 7 SURRENDER EMAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 3, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 3, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |