USPTO serial 78379007
QQQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QQQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rancho Dominguez, CA
Rancho Dominguez, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Natland
SUSAN M NATLAND KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP14TH FL 2040 MAIN STIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Attaché cases, garment bags for travel, beach bags, briefcases, canes, all-purpose sport bags, duffel bags, backpacks, handbags, key cases, wallets, purses, textile, leather and mesh shopping bags, tote bags, athletic bags, book bags, gym bags, overnight bags, fanny packs, rucksacks, cosmetic bags sold empty, toiletry cases sold empty, credit card cases, calling card cases, suitcases, traveling bags, trunks for traveling, umbrellas, and valises | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely pants, jeans, sweatpants, shorts, shirts, sweatshirts, t-shirts, blouses, skirts, dresses, jerseys, sweaters, pullovers, jackets, coats, swimwear, jumpers overalls, shortalls, vests, headwear and footwear | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |