Drawing for AVORIO

USPTO serial 78387889

AVORIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AVORIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marvin H. Kleinberg

Marvin H. Kleinberg KLEINBERG & LERNER LLP2049 CENTURY PARK E STE 1080LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Televisions; televisions with video recorders integrated; projection TVs; television screens; video projectors, digital audio disc players and recorders; amplifiers; high fidelity micro/mini systems comprised of stereo tuners, stereo receivers, stereo speakers, CD players and recorders, cassette players and recorders; programmable digital video disc players and recorders; programmable digital audio disc players and recorders; camcorders; audio-video receivers; set top boxes; personal video recorders; video transmitters; video senders for the wireless transmission of video signals to a remote television receiver; converters; encoders; television decoders; audio cables; video cables; remote controls for radios, televisions, stereos; headphones; antennasACTIVE—
020Furniture, namely wall units, cabinets, entertainment centers, chests, display tables, hutches, wooden boxes for storageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 20, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 15, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 21, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 29, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 10, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance