Drawing for DISPLAYSYNC

USPTO serial 78391184

DISPLAYSYNC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAN, AMY C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISPLAYSYNC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D. Krugman

Gary D. Krugman Sughrue Mion, PLLC2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer displays, plasma displays, liquid crystal displays, electroluminescent displays; computer software for use in controlling and operating computer displays, plasma displays, liquid crystal displays and electroluminescent displays; computer software used for processing signals within computer displays, plasma displays, liquid crystal displays and electroluminescent displays; computer hardware and software incorporated into computer displays, plasma displays, liquid crystal displays and electroluminescent displays for operating computer displays, plasma displays, liquid crystal displays and electroluminescent displays as well as allowing acceptance of and input of data from independent video, computer and software sources; computer software used for creating and displaying audio and video presentations and communication software used for connecting users to a computer display networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 11, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 17, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 4, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 30, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 23, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance