Drawing for HEALTHY PET

USPTO serial 78392555

HEALTHY PET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHY PET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael F. Hughes

MICHAEL F HUGHES HUGHES LAW FIRM PLLC4164 MERIDIAN ST STE 302BELLINGHAM, WA 98226UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031animal litterACTIVEOct 17, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 21, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 21, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 13, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 26, 2006GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 26, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 5, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 13, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance