Drawing for PURE.TEXAN.BEER.

USPTO serial 78398911

PURE.TEXAN.BEER.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURE.TEXAN.BEER.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William B Nash

WILLIAM B NASH JACKSON WALKER LLP112 E PECAN STE 2100SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BeerACTIVEJun 30, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 14, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 27, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 23, 2005LIECLEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION—
May 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance