Drawing for VEXTRA

USPTO serial 78403068

VEXTRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VEXTRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda A. Tancs

LINDA A TANCS NORRIS, MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS PA721 ROUTE 202-206, 2ND FLBRIDGEWATER, NJ 08807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007electric food blendersACTIVE—
009televisions, DVD players, video cameras, radios, karaoke machines, audio speakers, telephones and electric ironsACTIVE—
011hair dryers, electric toasters, electric toaster ovens and microwave ovens for cookingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 8, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance