USPTO serial 78408016
PLUG AND PROTECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLUG AND PROTECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory J. Chinlund
GREGORY J CHINLUND MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 S WACKER DR STE 6300SEARS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ANTI INTRUSION ALARMS; FIRE ALARMS; MOTION DETECTORS; BURGLAR ALARMS; WARNING DEVICES, NAMELY, SIRENS, BELLS, ELECTRIC FENCES; EMERGENCY WARNING LIGHTS; ELECTRIC LOCKS; CLOSED CIRCUIT CAMERAS; PERSONAL SECURITY ALARMS; SIGNALING, SURVEYING AND MONITORING EQUIPMENT FOR SECURITY, AUTOMATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, NAMELY, TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CENTRAL MONITORING STATIONS, REPEATERS, COMMUNICATORS, CONTROL PANELS, NETWORKABLE BUS DEVICES; SIGNALING MODEMS, DIALERS, TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS AND DEVICES FOR LOCAL AND REMOTE RADIO TELEPHONE AND WIRELESS TRANSMISSION OF ALARMS, COMMAND AND DATA SIGNALS; HOME AUTOMATION AND HOME CONTROL SYSTEMS COMPRISING DETECTORS, SENSORS, CONTROL PANELS, BUS DEVICES, TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS, GATEWAYS, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR HOME AUTOMATION AND HOME NETWORKING SYSTEMS, NAMELY, FOR USE WITH ANTI INTRUSION ALARMS AND ANCILLARY CONTROL OF LIGHTING, HEATING AND AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEMS; ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS COMPRISING CARD READERS, NUMERIC KEY PAD, IDENTIFICATION TAGS AND CARDS, CONTROL PANELS, STAND ALONE DOOR ACCESS CONTROLLERS, RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION DEVICE READERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ACCESS CONTROL MANAGEMENT, SIGNAL TRANSMITTERS AND SIGNAL RECEIVERS; HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ALLOWING MULTIPLE HOMES TO BE CONNECTED TO A CENTRAL LOCATION FOR REMOTE MONITORING AND CONTROLLING OF THE SYSTEMS IN THE HOME AND FOR ALLOWING AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUALS ACCESS TO THE SYSTEMS IN THE HOME FROM REMOTE LOCATIONS VIA COMMUNICATION LINES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |