USPTO serial 78415380
NUTRI-SNACKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, STANLEY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUTRI-SNACKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David G. Rosenbaum
DAVID G ROSENBAUM ROSENBAUM & ASSOCIATES PC650 DUNDEE RD STE #380NORTHBROOK, IL 60062UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DISTRIBUTORSHIPS IN FIELD OF HEALTHY SNACK FOODS; VENDING MACHINE SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2004 | GNPE | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |