USPTO serial 78424627
TANGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COOPER, CHRISTINE H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TANGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Liza Meyers
9948 E MAPLEWOOD AVE 3RD FLENGLEWOOD, CO 80111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care and styling products, namely, hair care preparations, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair styling preparations, hair gel, hair mousses, hair pomades, hair lacquers, hair mascara, hair rinses, hair spray, hair waving lotion, hair straightening preparations, hair color; women's beauty products, namely, facial washes, facial scrubs and facial masks, face and body creams, gels and lotions, shaving preparations; men's grooming products, namely, shaving preparations, after-shave lotions, after-shave gels, after-shave balms, after-shave creams, facial washes, facial scrubs and facial masks; antiperspirants; sun care lotions, sunscreen, sun-tanning preparations, self-tanning preparations, and after-sun lotions; problem skin treatments, namely, non-medicated skin creams, anti-aging creams, wrinkle removing skin care preparations; room fragrances, scented room spray, scented body spray and fragrances for men and women | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 21, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |